Everyones heard of Halo 3. If you don't know about Warhawk, look it up, and vote.

Gameplay Trailers:

WarHawk (PS3)


Halo 3 (Xbox 360)

Comon Halo 3, 4life!

I've added some trailers for you SnakeTheFox, and I put the WarHawk one first as most people probably never saw it with the exception of Mohdgame and a few others..

I also made sure the trailers showed gameplay, that way people can make a fair choice, although playing it is better, but that's as close as we're going to get for now.

In my opinion, warhawk is better and funner. I mean its online. Warhawk has loads more than Halo 3 can offer. Halo 3 is just an over-hyped game based on Halo 2's reputation. The reason that Halo 2 was so succesful that there were no games to compete with it.

Warhawk has air-planes and dogfights, has turrets and loads of weapons, tanks, humvee's! Cars, battle buses. It has multiplayer ( 4 players split screen) can play online together!

So you can invite 3 of your friend to you home and play online together on a tank! It's based more in tactic and skill than just luck. it has ground, aerial battles. The weapon system is so balaced.

The only problem that the game is ONLINE only, there is no single player on it. The servers are pretty faster than GoW. It never lags and its 40 players war. I mean honestly, warhawk has triple the weapons that Halo 3 can offer.

Tell me, why should I buy Halo 3 when I have Warhawk? single player? You can't vote until you played both. I played Halo 3 beta, and its not enough to get to know the game.

The poll is for which game people are anticipating more, so saying you can't vote until you've played it is stupid.

Warhawk looks too much like a cheap Battlefield rip-off, like Warrock or something. It just looks bland and simple. Halo offers split-screen 4 player and online at the same time, hell it offered that in Halo 2. Halo holds many things over Warhawks head; a VERY well established fanbase, extremely balanced weapons, unlike many other games where one weapon rules them all, it offers many vehicles, and air vehicles as well, but don't confuse Halo with a Battlefield rip-off like Warhawk is, Halo doesn't aim to make large scale battles with tons of people, that would ruin the game, and it does require tactics, but not the same kind of tactics found in games like Warhawk or battlefield. The games are in two different Genres, so don't compare them by features in-game. It's like saying you don't like a Final Fantasy game because it doesn't have massive online Air battles like Blazing Angels.

Halo 3 :)

SnakeTheFox Wrote:The poll is for which game people are anticipating more, so saying you can't vote until you've played it is stupid.

Warhawk looks too much like a cheap Battlefield rip-off, like Warrock or something. It just looks bland and simple. Halo offers split-screen 4 player and online at the same time, hell it offered that in Halo 2. Halo holds many things over Warhawks head; a VERY well established fanbase, extremely balanced weapons, unlike many other games where one weapon rules them all, it offers many vehicles, and air vehicles as well, but don't confuse Halo with a Battlefield rip-off like Warhawk is, Halo doesn't aim to make large scale battles with tons of people, that would ruin the game, and it does require tactics, but not the same kind of tactics found in games like Warhawk or battlefield. The games are in two different Genres, so don't compare them by features in-game. It's like saying you don't like a Final Fantasy game because it doesn't have massive online Air battles like Blazing Angels.

Tell me something that warhawk doesen't have?

A well established franchise and fan-base eagerly anticipating its arrival.

SnakeTheFox Wrote:A well established franchise and fan-base eagerly anticipating its arrival.

I see, so you don't care about the gameplay? You care about its profits? They wont give you any commissions ;). Warhawk has better game play. Also, what you said explained something, "Overhyped game".

It could offer Pandas, Rocket Launchers and a Taco, though wouldn't make a difference. It doesn't offer the same GAMEPLAY as Halo, and Halo's GAMEPLAY is the one I'm waiting for. Tell me, what does IT offer new? The battles are no bigger than Battlefield. Battlefield also offers air and land battles that are immense. The online play will be nowhere near as polished as Halo's. Halo offers some of the best multiplayer on console, and will still hold that over Warhawks head in Halo 3. It offers Six-axis new. WOW, thats incentive to buy a game, a little ball that rolls around to fly airplanes. It just doesn't look amazing to me. It looks like another online shooter, nothing more.

The public just accepts Halo more. IT'S what's played at MLG tournaments, IT'S what you see Game Reviewers always talking about kicking another magazines ass at, IT'S what you see people on the street talking about. It's well-established and eagerly anticipated by SO many people. Halos multiplayer will continue to draw plenty of people, even in Halo 3. As much as I can tell you dislike the Halo franchise, it just doesn't change the fact that nearly everyone wants Halo 3, nearly everyone is anticipating Halo 3, and nearly every will buy, and I'm sure will enjoy, Halo 3.