thats a kool song, and i have to say after playing my friends ps3... its not that bad of a console... the 6 axis us useless in my opinion and the rumble being absent drives me crazy... but the only real problem i see with it is the controls and no games. There may be an alright title selection, but nothing i want to play.

SnakeTheFox Wrote:The fact that the PS3 loses titles all the same.

I wasn't making a point of 360 losing more titles, just the fact that PS3 and 360 have nearly got all the same games, It's getting quite silly now imo.

It's gone from Console ports to PC to 360 to ps3 or whatever.

SnakeTheFox Wrote:All games that were originally PS3 exclusive. Sure, not as many as the 360, but with LBP, and MGS4 being the only good not yet launched games that the PS3 has, I'm not surprised (I have no hopes for the new Final Fantasy, the series went downhill after 9).

Agreed.

DeathNoteL Wrote:

SnakeTheFox Wrote:The fact that the PS3 loses titles all the same.

I wasn't making a point of 360 losing more titles, just the fact that PS3 and 360 have nearly got all the same games, It's getting quite silly now imo.

It's gone from Console ports to PC to 360 to ps3 or whatever.

Companies are simply realizing that making something exclusive does NOT make it a money maker, and that multi-platform releases are actually more profitable.

I for one am happy with this. I don't need "lol 360 has teh moar excluzives!"-penis compensator line, I just want to play games, and if I get more games, that's a plus.

Anyhow, I'll say it again; Bioshock wasn't that good to begin with, in my honest opinion. It wasn't bad, but it was a 7/10 game.

Yeah, but wouldn't you want at least half of your console's exclusives to stay exclusives?

I'd be quite annoyed if say "Zack and Wiki" or any other 2nd party or 3rd party exclusive got a 360 port after 4 months of being a wii game, it just now seems pointless when it comes to picking a console as eventually bar a few games, they will all share the same ones.

I hope things don't go that way, but looking at the whole ps3 and 360, it's going to end up that way.

PS3 has ONE good exclusive I'd buy for it(MGS4) and 360 only has ONE exclusive i'd buy which is Eternal Sonata, the rest of games i want are Orange Box, Oblivion, and a few more, which are on both 360 and PS3. But I'd buy a 360 because it's cheaper then a PS3. so apart from a 2 game difference the only other reason I'd have to look at a console for now would be specs, which I don't even care about...see my point?

DeathNoteL Wrote:Yeah, but wouldn't you want at least half of your console's exclusives to stay exclusives?

I'd be quite annoyed if say "Zack and Wiki" or any other 2nd party or 3rd party exclusive got a 360 port after 4 months of being a wii game, it just now seems pointless when it comes to picking a console as eventually bar a few games, they will all share the same ones.

I hope things don't go that way, but looking at the whole ps3 and 360, it's going to end up that way.

PS3 has ONE good exclusive I'd buy for it(MGS4) and 360 only has ONE exclusive i'd buy which is Eternal Sonata, the rest of games i want are Orange Box, Oblivion, and a few more, which are on both 360 and PS3. But I'd buy a 360 because it's cheaper then a PS3. so apart from a 2 game difference the only other reason I'd have to look at a console for now would be specs, which I don't even care about...see my point?

I know what you mean (personally I hated Eternal Sonata, I loved Blue Dragon and Lost Odyssey much more), but my point is that, unlike 10 years ago, consoles, at least the PS3 and 360, are very alike in Hardware specs, unlike say, the N64 and PS1, which were completely different. Now that hardware is getting more, leveled out, lets say (in b4 Sonyfag screaming "SONY HAS OVER A GAJILLION MORE MEGAWATTS OF GAMING POWER!"), so multi-platform releases are becoming more common.

I understand your argument, but personally I could care less for exclusives. I play games to play games, not to harden my penis gloating "I HAS MOAR EXCLUSIVES HUR HUR", which is in contrast to a lot of people out there. On occasion I will poke fun at Mohd over 360 exclusives, but that's more just to troll him than anything else.

Yeah it seems that exclusives are not really exclusives any more...This even occurred with the PSP. When GTA:LCS came out they boasted that it would be a PSP exclusive. Eventually, this became untrue as it was ported over to the PS2.

And Saints Row, which was originally a 360 exclusive franchise started to branch out. Saints Row 2 will not only be on the PS3 but the PC as well. And as for Saints Row 1, that won't even be an exclusive as there will be a mobile phone version of the game.

SnakeTheFox Wrote:personally I hated Eternal Sonata,

How come? looks good to me, reminds me alot of Tales Of Symphonia.

SnakeTheFox Wrote:I understand your argument, but personally I could care less for exclusives. I play games to play games, not to harden my penis gloating "I HAS MOAR EXCLUSIVES HUR HUR", which is in contrast to a lot of people out there. On occasion I will poke fun at Mohd over 360 exclusives, but that's more just to troll him than anything else.

Oh, I don't really care for gloating over exclusives, it just saddens me that consoles don't really have exclusives, you need something other than specs to stand out imo. (Tacky gimmick's don't count, Nintendo.)

DeathNoteL Wrote:

SnakeTheFox Wrote:personally I hated Eternal Sonata,

How come? looks good to me, reminds me alot of Tales Of Symphonia.

Personally I can't stand any kind of JRPG or Anime that has 90% of its character-base composed of effeminate, metrosexual and androgynous looking teenage boys.

It's been done too many times before, in my opinion. Lost Odyssey on the other hand, *GASP* actually has ADULTS saving the world, not 14 year olds.

Just a personal preference.

If you want a portable grill, buy a PS3, thats all it's good for. Sony is on their way out, stick to Nintendo and Xbox. Thats the bombs of the industry.

SnakeTheFox Wrote:Personally I can't stand any kind of JRPG or Anime that has 90% of its character-base composed of effeminate, metrosexual and androgynous looking teenage boys.

It's been done too many times before, in my opinion. Lost Odyssey on the other hand, *GASP* actually has ADULTS saving the world, not 14 year olds.

Just a personal preference.

ah well, if you hate J-rpgs then I can't really take your opinion of Eternal Sonata since you're gonna be bias, since you hate them and all.

Is Lost Odyssey more of a RTS / RPG, haven't really looked into it, but saw a few screenshots looked kinda like a RTS mixed with RPG elements, and i kinda got a whole hack n slash feel. If so I'll skip that one, I can not stand RTS games, they have never really been interesting to me. bar Pikmin...if you count that as a RTS..